I've got nothing against guns - what I have got something against is the (sadly unavoidable) fact that a tiny minority of gun owners, both here and in the US end-up shooting innocent people. That said, I fail to see why anyone in the States who either doesn't hunt, or hunts anything less than the largest prey available, needs something as powerful as an AK-47. I do wonder if the time has come for them to regulate access to such weaponry so that the Second Amendment reference to a free militia isn't infringed, but so one individual cannot have sole access. Perhaps a system where a collection belonging to a group is stored in a secure facility with a security system that requires more than one authorised militia member to take weapons out of the building? This would at least limit the sort of guns that people can keep at home to those with which they can defend themselves and their property, but without being able to mow down large numbers of people in just few seconds.