- Joined
- Sunday February 7, 2021
- Location
- Nottinghamshire
You do take this element to another level, I find it fun and engaging, and the amount of work that goes in is obvious.I should also note, though I dislike the advertising aspect I try to make it fun. And I am quite passionate about the world building we have done over the years and the ongoing story/saga; Different characters coming and going, anagrams, codes, other easter eggs, etc...even wrote Ebooks and a Softcover! Our labels and ads are portals/windows into this universe! I know it's not everyone's cup of tea, and I'm ok with that. Just want to point out we do work really hard and this isn't just some hustle, I really pour my soul and creativity into this. Also, I don't exploit wet shavers, hell I am a wet shaver and collector first! Again, this is my passion and I am always happy to help and educate where I can.
This is the more interesting stuff (I think) we do, and wish would be talked about instead...but sensationalism and negative news always wins out.
There's a few of us around that were around during the PPF/HTGAM scandal, including me.History
Phoenix Artisan Accoutrements has a long (infamous) history in the artisan soap making world. The company started as How to Grow a Moustache in 2013 and is owned by Erik Hodges. Erik Hodges advertises heavily and offers free soap products to reviewers in exchange for glowing remarks. (Source Video #1) New shavers frequently find his products and don’t realize the historical and ongoing extent of Erik’s unscrupulous business practices.
Not my words, but start of a Reddit article. https://www.reddit.com/r/Wetshaving/wiki/artisanwiki/paa/
I haven't, and wouldn't buy any PAA items after reading the article. It's up to you whether or not you do, but it is good to be informed.
Phoenix Artisan Accoutrements. That's been covered.I've heard about the PAA issues, some of the Paradigm, but the rest I'm clueless about! Sometimes ignorance is bliss, but that's not to say right and proper.
Would respectfully disagree with the point that owners of companies shouldn’t interact with these kinds of threads, as it otherwise damages their reputation and business. Personally have a lot of respect for Douglas from PAA coming on here to explain things from his perspective and answer any queries and concerns that people have, as well as take the flak. That takes a lot of courage, and yes it’s damage limitation but also a way to demonstrate that, although there have been mistakes in the past, and errors of judgment, that was many years ago and lessons - I suspect hard lessons - have been learnt. It changed my perception of the situation, and I’m sure it’s changed other people’s perception of the situation too.There's a few of us around that were around during the PPF/HTGAM scandal, including me.
They've kept their nose squeaky clean since they started PAA. Everything in that article before PAA started is absolutely true. Everything after PAA started is either coincidence or hearsay. That isn't to say it's not true, it very well could be. Might not be either.
I tend to think it's more of an unfortunate coincidence.
PAA is and has been under a microscope for years. As you can see from this thread, they are still in damage control mode. Put the right spin on it, deflect, etc.
They've joined a select group of shave related businesses that have shot themselves in the foot, spectacularly and publicly:
Phoenix Artisan Accoutrements
The Superior Shave
Razor Emporium
The Holy Black
Paradigm
Weber
Most of it can be ascribed to 'new business' woes, and just not knowing how a business ought to be run. Should they be 'blacklisted' or 'boycotted?' 10 years ago, I probably would have said "aye."
In today's world, with their sins in the past, I say let sleeping dogs lie. The less owners of the companies in question interact with these kinds of threads, the better for the company being discussed. There is no way to come across as anything but defensive, and it's not a good look.
I've said my piece. Moving on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?