i like that idea however surely the sender will still be charged on weight ?Even up to an inch could be packaged in a slimline box to fit through practically every letterbox. Think how BT do it with their Home Hubs.
Wickham's first Super Smooth were in very wide, slim tubs. I rather liked them:
^ these were over 6" wide and under 1" thick.
Frags and balms? Yeah, flask-like bottles.
I think you're there with your thinking but don't obsess too much about the large letter size. Unless you went for very slim bladders for flat packing liquid/balm there'd be no advantage. Also, remember that a large but thin surface is vulnerable to piercing, and that's not some thing you want with flammable liquids.
Think a little bigger, but still letterbox size.
No, it gets charged as a large letter not a small parcel , so cheaper.i like that idea however surely the sender will still be charged on weight ?
You bread those big US carrier pigeons the size of an albatross don't you!How about a pckg. that a carrier pigeon can transport across the Atlantic for a handful of seed?
ah ok i didn't realiseNo, it gets charged as a large letter not a small parcel , so cheaper.P.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?