- Messages
- 715
jhclare said:Update:
I've been using boars for a while now, and while they are very good, and even better when you consider the price, they just aren't quite as good as a badger. They are certainly better value though! This isn't a dig at boar fans, I really wanted to like them.
I face lather, and I don't use a bowl or a scuttle. So, my brush has to hold plenty of lather and keep it warm (or at least, prevent it getting too cold).
I found that no matter how much I load a boar, I never get enough quality lather for 4 passes. By the fourth pass, the lather is thin and needs reloading. Maybe it's my hard water? I'm always amazed that people say, for example, their Semogue 620 holds enough for 4 passes with loads left over.... how big are their faces, tennis ball size?!
With my Savile Row, there is just more lather there in the brush. I don't know why or how, it just is! It's like it gives you just the lather you need for a pass and no more, and saves the rest for later. Boars tend to dump it all out and hold on to very little.
Of course, there is nothing wrong with having to re-load and re-lather, but personally I cannot stand having to do this! I don't know why, it's just me.
Anyway, this has also forced me to reconsider my ideal brush (again....). A larger brush will hold more lather and keep it warmer, important if you are bowl and scuttle-less like me. I think a Chubby 2 is in my future! :mrgreen:
John
John,
It's been awhile. Last I saw you posted on SMF and TSD. I don't quite recall the brush you went with but I know you were looking for some Omegas or Semogues. What did you end up with? What soaps or creams are you using?
BTW I've experienced hard water and feel your pain my friend. Until I started face lathering bowl/mug lathering proved to be quite a feat with creams that is. Ever since then I vowed to myself creams belong on brush and face not bowl/mug.
I've used both Semogue 830 and 620 side by side and 620 out performed 830 in terms of lathering. While both are quite good. The shorter loft in 620 surpassed that of 830. Perhaps it was my fault as I didn't load 830 as much considering I loaded them equally with similar amount of cream. Soap-wise, same procedure and again 620 outperformed 830.