- Messages
- 1,860
- Location
- St Leonards, Dorset
There is a difference, at least for me. Wolfman (have several) = great number of angles, no thinking while shaving. BBS-1 = specific angle with a bit of pressure to obtain same result. Both are great razors.Is there any difference between the BBS-1 and Wolfman?
Is there any difference between the BBS-1 and Wolfman?
Yes, the head geometry is different. The BBS-1 actually sports a 1mm blade gap which roughly equates to 0.71-0.76 on a regular Wolfman razor head as far as aggression goes. The shave will still be different between the two though due to the difference in design. To me the BBS-1 gives a smoother-feeling shaving experience.
There is a difference, at least for me. Wolfman (have several) = great number of angles, no thinking while shaving. BBS-1 = specific angle with a bit of pressure to obtain same result. Both are great razors.
Hell @Blademonkey has an Omega knot stuffed into a dog toy for god sake. It's awesome.
Got a link for that? I can't find it, and would love to see it!
It was in his SOTD just today, I think. Last couple of days anyway.
Thank you, it works for me.Ah the "Kong" brush! Very cool!
just because its expensive or of stainless doesn't mean its going to be better workmanship or better material.Hi,
I agree with you guys... I have tested many de razors through the years: vintage, new, and stainless steel included. And I see the sense of grabbing a expensive SS one only because its finishing and preferences about design & good materials, like for example my beloved Weber Arc. But in a dessert island I'll be perfectly happy with a cheap Lord L6, which provides with excellent shaves for a ridiculously price... so I simply don't believe that a 10 times more expensive razor will give you a 10 times better shave, only slightly more pleasant could be... the rest is a matter of collecting & appreciation IMHO.
Just my 50 cents.
Cheers