- Messages
- 1,860
- Location
- St Leonards, Dorset
There is a difference, at least for me. Wolfman (have several) = great number of angles, no thinking while shaving. BBS-1 = specific angle with a bit of pressure to obtain same result. Both are great razors.Is there any difference between the BBS-1 and Wolfman?
Is there any difference between the BBS-1 and Wolfman?
Yes, the head geometry is different. The BBS-1 actually sports a 1mm blade gap which roughly equates to 0.71-0.76 on a regular Wolfman razor head as far as aggression goes. The shave will still be different between the two though due to the difference in design. To me the BBS-1 gives a smoother-feeling shaving experience.
There is a difference, at least for me. Wolfman (have several) = great number of angles, no thinking while shaving. BBS-1 = specific angle with a bit of pressure to obtain same result. Both are great razors.
Hell @Blademonkey has an Omega knot stuffed into a dog toy for god sake. It's awesome.
Got a link for that? I can't find it, and would love to see it!
It was in his SOTD just today, I think. Last couple of days anyway.
Thank you, it works for me.Ah the "Kong" brush! Very cool!![]()
![]()
just because its expensive or of stainless doesn't mean its going to be better workmanship or better material.Hi,
I agree with you guys... I have tested many de razors through the years: vintage, new, and stainless steel included. And I see the sense of grabbing a expensive SS one only because its finishing and preferences about design & good materials, like for example my beloved Weber Arc. But in a dessert island I'll be perfectly happy with a cheap Lord L6, which provides with excellent shaves for a ridiculously price... so I simply don't believe that a 10 times more expensive razor will give you a 10 times better shave, only slightly more pleasant could be... the rest is a matter of collecting & appreciation IMHO.
Just my 50 cents.
Cheers