With you all the way on that. I used film cameras and processed and printed all my own films (transparencies, colour included) for years, and I had my first camera at the end of the 1950s. The big attraction of digital was, for me, the absence of the rocketing costs of film and consumables, together with a massive decline in the range and choice available. Many of my favourite 35mm films just disappeared.
I think that those of us who have an analogue background of some long duration have retained the disciplines of shooting with film (framing, composition, "get it right first time" mentality, plus a view on financial economy), and personally, I always look and think before I take a photograph. That said, there are sometimes occasions when taking a lot of photographs rapidly with a digital camera can be great; for example, when I photograph my grandsons, who seem to be still for only nanoseconds.
My wife of more than 50 years died recently, and this prompted me to go through thousands of prints, slides, contacts and negs, and in doing so, it struck me that a large proportion of them (taken mostly with Nikon F series F2AS,F2SB,F3) look better to me than a lot of my later digital stuff.
When I sold my film Nikons (but keeping a couple of favourite lenses), I also parted with all my darkroom gear. Nowadays, I could probably set most of it up again, with second-hand equipment, at a fraction of what it cost me back then, but the cost and scarcity of film and consumables nowadays makes it a no-no.
