I'm not going to lie, this is new information to me. I have heard people talk of negative blade exposure before, but assumed it was such tiny measurements that it made no difference. And being fair, .013 of a millimetre is fairly small.And yet, what many mild razor enthusiasts miss is the problematic design issues with negative blade exposure.
If you use perfect technique (ie, no pressure), while employing the shave angle the razor is designed for, it is actually not possible for the blade to touch the skin. Instead, the rigidity and sharpness of the blade merely slices through the extending hairs.
Here's a perfect example from Tatara Razors:
View attachment 38601
The Tatara Masamune above is designed to shave within .13 mm of your skin. So, if you are BBS after using it, then you had to have used pressure, pulled out hairs, or you have thin hairs and a sparse beard that merely "feels" smoother to the skin, instead of actually getting to the skin.
Several versions of Techs, Karve plates AA, A, B, and C, the Razorock Mamba, and the Tatara above all have negative blade exposure.
But what if you have sensitive skin, curly hairs, a proclivity to ingrown hairs, thick beard growth, with a mixture of thick hairs and wiry think hairs, like I do?
It is foolhardy to say "YMMV" and every razor is different and your face is different, and then assume that certain razors will shave certain faces equally well with an equal number of passes "if you have good technique and prep".
That is wrong.
For me, my face feels pretty darn smooth some 10+ hours after shaving with the R41, H, GC 84, and even with the less comfortable Dart before returning that.
On the other hand, I noticed more growth and stubble on my face after only a few hours, when I shave with some Techs, my Slim on 2, Ming Shi on 1.
Again, YMMV.
Happy shaves.
Yes they all work but they have to work on variable mediums, and when my skin was more taut and my stubble less grey, the tech was all I needed.It's a good point well made. To you, a shave is more comfortable in two passes than three. Has nothing to do with the razors ability to shave - they all work.
It's this that we need more of - misinformation guiding people to try new razors and blades when their shaves aren't up to scratch is the problem I have
Blade exposure beyond the edge of the cap matters more than air space under the blade edge, the Fatip and the OLD type have pretty close to zero gap.
It's not a good laugh, per se, but there shouldn't really be any razors which are inherently too aggressive. When you can run a blade across your face with no guard you don't really take any notice anymore while using a DE. They can all do a good jobIndeed and I see the world from the same (shaving) angle. Between that and how firmly the blade is actually held in place. This is where I see big benefits in SE. Less flex across the entire blade.
I guess the straight razor community must be having a good laugh at this thread.
I don't get this.Blade exposure beyond the edge of the cap matters more than air space under the blade edge, the Fatip and the OLD type have pretty close to zero gap.
Having dodgy skin I never chased BBS but I understand where you're coming from.When I began to just merely shave and quit fretting over the quest for the elusive BBS I became much happier. Shaves became more relaxing and life got better.
I don't get this.
Adjustable razors work by changing the blade gap not the exposure.
The 1914 has huge exposure and is less aggressive than both the '24 and the Streamline.
I'm sure exposure plays a part but blade gap is as much, if not more, a determining factor.
There's a few ways to increase the aggression it's down to the entire geometry of the head which is why comparing only one factor (usually gap) between different razors is pointless.
View attachment 38640
So, in fewer words, you ride the cap and the curvature of the cap would also play its part in determining the aggression.Smoothest shaves come from a very shallow blade angle, the cap and the blade are on my face with minimal contact with the guard. The thickness and placement of the cap in relation to the blade edge governs aggressiveness and smoothness. Adjustables work only with a larger blade angle, and to take full advantage of higher settings, you have to rotate the handle closer to your face, or just continue to use the cap and blade edge on your face and forget about the guard. I think you should always forget about the guard anyway,... you know you can ride a bike when the training wheels no longer touch the ground,... yes, the guard is like training wheels.
So, in fewer words, you ride the cap and the curvature of the cap would also play its part in determining the aggression.
This still doesn't explain an SE with more blade exposure shaves less aggressively than another SE.
Really?I really can't help you there,... most Ever-Ready, GEM, Star, etc. razors feel the same to my face, just different in the hand.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?