Rev-O Joined Friday July 10, 2009 Sunday November 8, 2009 #1 <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.h ... 94609ED7CF</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.h ... 94609ED7CF</a><!-- m -->
Pig Cat Joined Friday July 10, 2009 Location Suffolk Sunday November 8, 2009 #2 Rather appropriate considering some recent incendiary remarks here.
cheese_dave Joined Wednesday October 7, 2009 Sunday November 8, 2009 #3 I went all giddy when I read that.
J James_uk Joined Tuesday June 1, 2010 Monday November 1, 2010 #4 Rev-O said: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF Click to expand... That's a good one :lol:
Rev-O said: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF Click to expand... That's a good one :lol:
OP Rev-O Joined Friday July 10, 2009 Tuesday November 2, 2010 Thread Starter #5 James_uk said: Rev-O said: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF Click to expand... That's a good one :lol: Click to expand... Not for the people involved.
James_uk said: Rev-O said: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9803E2DA133AE533A2575AC0A9649D94609ED7CF Click to expand... That's a good one :lol: Click to expand... Not for the people involved.
Jeltz Joined Monday January 4, 2010 Location Wiltshire Tuesday November 2, 2010 #6 Well that's my initial thoughts too but having noticed it was published December 9, 1891, I guess that the families won't be around be upset now :ugeek:
Well that's my initial thoughts too but having noticed it was published December 9, 1891, I guess that the families won't be around be upset now :ugeek: