PAL Single Edge Carbon Blades

Messages
3,205
Location
West Norfolk. UK
Greetings

A week or so ago on this forum we were discussing PAL blued carbon single edge blades.
http://www.theshavingroom.co.uk/com...riday-26th-may-2017.43213/page-12#post-641524

I stated at the time and have done so before that I was fairly sure the PAL blades that are available in boxes of 100 are not the same blades as those that are available in the states sold in drugstores as PAL Super in packets of 5 with each blade wrapped in brown shelling paper or in plastic cassettes of 10, in both cases the blades are mounted on card to be hung on shop displays.

I complained that sadly it was impossible to obtain the super shaving blades in the UK, I was wrong and it was pointed out to me by culcreuch that amazon would ship me one packet of 5 blades from the USA (at a price) £9.49!

I have taken one for the team and this afternoon my blades arrived from the states, I already had 4 PAL blades from a box of 100 that I was kindly given to try about three years ago; try them I did and they were as rough as hell it was quite possible to shave with them and they produced a reasonably decent finish but the shave was a very uncomfortable unpleasant experience.

Here are the blades side by side, the PAL Super are on the left:- PAL Blades differences.JPG

You will see that the PAL super blades are marked with the blade thickness on the spine ie
9 thou, this is the same as GEM Blue Star Carbons and Treet Carbons and industrial blades of this thickness (with the exception of the GEM Stainless PTFE Coated blades)
The blades from the 100 box are stamped PAL.

When I examined the blades under a loupe both are three faceted ie the blades have a secondary bevel but the grind marks on the PAL Super blade are considerably and visibly much finer indicating a finer abrasive has been used, the bevel sizes and thus the bevel angles appear identical.

The real test is in the shaving, so as to make the test as scientific and meaningful as possible I used two identical GEM OCMM razors and my favourite brush and soap, Tabac and a brush with a L'Occitane synthetic knot.

The evaluation took less than three seconds so great was the difference, the PAL Super blade was as smooth as silk and the PAL blade from the 100 box was as rough as a bears arse! I was surprised that the difference was so pronounced. I carried on a little with the rough Pal but finished my shave with the PAL Super.

The upshot is that unless the blades say super on them they are not shaving quality blades, the blades sold on e bay and by all the lab supply houses in or from the 100 boxes are not shaving quality blades, this is the case with all the GEM/Personna/ASR/Energiser Carbon range the GEM Blue Stars and The Treet Carbons say Super on them all others are not (unless you are desperate Dan) good enough to shave with even though they are all from the same factory.

I am away in the tent for a week as from tomorrow so will shave further with the PAL Super blades and report back. It would be great if somebody could source some of these in bulk from the USA at a semi- sensible price, my research in the past has always drew a blank.

PAL Super Blades (front).JPG

Regards
Dick.
 
Greetings

A week or so ago on this forum we were discussing PAL blued carbon single edge blades.
http://www.theshavingroom.co.uk/com...riday-26th-may-2017.43213/page-12#post-641524

I stated at the time and have done so before that I was fairly sure the PAL blades that are available in boxes of 100 are not the same blades as those that are available in the states sold in drugstores as PAL Super in packets of 5 with each blade wrapped in brown shelling paper or in plastic cassettes of 10, in both cases the blades are mounted on card to be hung on shop displays.

I complained that sadly it was impossible to obtain the super shaving blades in the UK, I was wrong and it was pointed out to me by culcreuch that amazon would ship me one packet of 5 blades from the USA (at a price) £9.49!

I have taken one for the team and this afternoon my blades arrived from the states, I already had 4 PAL blades from a box of 100 that I was kindly given to try about three years ago; try them I did and they were as rough as hell it was quite possible to shave with them and they produced a reasonably decent finish but the shave was a very uncomfortable unpleasant experience.

Here are the blades side by side, the PAL Super are on the left:- View attachment 25777

You will see that the PAL super blades are marked with the blade thickness on the spine ie
9 thou, this is the same as GEM Blue Star Carbons and Treet Carbons and industrial blades of this thickness (with the exception of the GEM Stainless PTFE Coated blades)
The blades from the 100 box are stamped PAL.

When I examined the blades under a loupe both are three faceted ie the blades have a secondary bevel but the grind marks on the PAL Super blade are considerably and visibly much finer indicating a finer abrasive has been used, the bevel sizes and thus the bevel angles appear identical.

The real test is in the shaving, so as to make the test as scientific and meaningful as possible I used two identical GEM OCMM razors and my favourite brush and soap, Tabac and a brush with a L'Occitane synthetic knot.

The evaluation took less than three seconds so great was the difference, the PAL Super blade was as smooth as silk and the PAL blade from the 100 box was as rough as a bears arse! I was surprised that the difference was so pronounced. I carried on a little with the rough Pal but finished my shave with the PAL Super.

The upshot is that unless the blades say super on them they are not shaving quality blades, the blades sold on e bay and by all the lab supply houses in or from the 100 boxes are not shaving quality blades, this is the case with all the GEM/Personna/ASR/Energiser Carbon range the GEM Blue Stars and The Treet Carbons say Super on them all others are not (unless you are desperate Dan) good enough to shave with even though they are all from the same factory.

I am away in the tent for a week as from tomorrow so will shave further with the PAL Super blades and report back. It would be great if somebody could source some of these in bulk from the USA at a semi- sensible price, my research in the past has always drew a blank.

View attachment 25778

Regards
Dick.
Well done for taking one for the team :) they sound great so far, will look forward to hearing your full report when back. Definitely need to be at more sensible prices though.
 
You will see that the PAL super blades are marked with the blade thickness on the spine ie
9 thou, this is the same as GEM Blue Star Carbons and Treet Carbons and industrial blades of this thickness (with the exception of the GEM Stainless PTFE Coated blades)
I recently received two PAL Super and two Treet carbon blades from a mate in the US. I'm currently testing the PALs.
The GEM Stainless PTFE blades have a blade thickness of 0.009" as well - I just measured them and blade and spine thickness are identical to the PAL Super blades.
The first PAL blade was very sharp and smooth to start with, but only lasted for three shaves. I'm currently doing a side-by-side comparison of the second PAL with a GEM blade (one half of the face each in identical 1912s), but I'm only on shave two with this experiment.
So far I can't feel a big difference between the two blades. From past experience, the GEM (doing half my face) should last more than ten shaves. I'll see how the PAL compares. And after that the Treets.
I'm secretly hoping the GEM blades come out on top, as they are cheaper and I have stocked a couple of hundred of them :D:D
 
I recently received two PAL Super and two Treet carbon blades from a mate in the US. I'm currently testing the PALs.
The GEM Stainless PTFE blades have a blade thickness of 0.009" as well - I just measured them and blade and spine thickness are identical to the PAL Super blades.
The first PAL blade was very sharp and smooth to start with, but only lasted for three shaves. I'm currently doing a side-by-side comparison of the second PAL with a GEM blade (one half of the face each in identical 1912s), but I'm only on shave two with this experiment.
So far I can't feel a big difference between the two blades. From past experience, the GEM (doing half my face) should last more than ten shaves. I'll see how the PAL compares. And after that the Treets.
I'm secretly hoping the GEM blades come out on top, as they are cheaper and I have stocked a couple of hundred of them :D:D
Greetings

You are quite right, I worded that badly, I meant that the GEM PTFE Stainless blades although 9 thou thick have stamped on their spines GEM on one side and stainless on the other.
I personally find the Treet Supers to be less good then the GEM blue stars, although I need more shaves with the PAL supers it seems so far they are very similar to the GEM blue stars and better then the Treets.

Regards
Dick.
 
Greetings

Whilst I was away for the week I shaved each morning with a GEM OCMM and a PAL Super Carbon Blade from the packet I purchased from Amazon. US. I got three really superb shaves from each blade but felt after the third shave that the blade was just about finished there is little doubt I could have pushed it to four shaves had I wished to be really frugal (or stupid) depending on your viewpoint!

I really do rate these blades, they are certainly easily as good (IMHO) as GEM Blue Star carbon blades probably a tiny bit better and unquestionably far superior to Treet Carbons.
Are they better than the GEM Stainless PTFE blades that are readily and cheaply available; for me the answer is yes, are they good value? Absolutely not, being way more expensive, difficult to obtain and shorter lived than the Stainless coated blades. Will I obtain more? Only if I can get them at a considerably lower price, which seems very unlikely.

I have at least put to bed the argument that these blades are the same as the PAL blades available in the 100 boxes. They most definitely are not.

Regards
Dick.
 
I've just ordered 10 of each of these. Should I cancel the order https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/232882479887[/QUOT
Bought some blades from this site and seller. Tried them out this morning for the first time in an Ever Ready vintage. I had 2 days growth and the Pal blade tugged like mad. In fairness, no weepers for ATG and WTG passes and a reasonable shave. After cleaning and drying the blade, I did a hand strop and the edges were burred. Will try again tomorrow, but not persuaded by this experience.
 
Bought some blades from this site and seller. Tried them out this morning for the first time in an Ever Ready vintage. I had 2 days growth and the Pal blade tugged like mad. In fairness, no weepers for ATG and WTG passes and a reasonable shave. After cleaning and drying the blade, I did a hand strop and the edges were burred. Will try again tomorrow, but not persuaded by this experience.

I bought mine from Connaught, and find them quite an uncomfortable shave, which surprised me, as thicker blades, compared to DE, normally suit me well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Update, after handstropping the Pal blade and playing around with the angle I'm holding the razor at, I got a much better shave this morning. Still a lot more pick up than after a 3 pass de shave. Will update on longevity of blade.
 
Ever ready 1912 razor and the blades both arrived yesterday. First 3-pass shave was with the GEM blade: Wilko shave oil and Body Shop Maca Root & Aloe shaving cream. Finishing with Alum block, Witch Hazel BP and Nivea post shave balm.
Really impressed with the shave. BBS with no soreness or weepers. I'll use it for a week and then consider it as a potential daily driver (current goto is a 1966 Gillette Slim Adjustable).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Back
Top Bottom